KOMAL @ CHHANNU RAM DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4678/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010189542026

Filing Number

MCRC/8037/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4678/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOMAL @ CHHANNU RAM DEWANGAN

    Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR DEWANGAN,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH, ,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 4678/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Komal @ Chhannu Ram Dewangan's second bail application in a narcotic drugs case where 5.8 kg of ganja was recovered from his possession. The court found him to be a habitual offender with a pending NDPS case and deemed him ineligible for bail, citing his prior misuse of bail and relying on the Supreme Court's precedent in *Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh*. The court directed expeditious trial completion within six months and instructed police to ensure witness attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4678/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 4678/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Komal @ Chhannu Ram Dewangan's second bail application in a narcotic drugs case where 5.8 kg of ganja was recovered from his possession. The court found him to be a habitual offender with a pending NDPS case and deemed him ineligible for bail, citing his prior misuse of bail and relying on the Supreme Court's precedent in *Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh*. The court directed expeditious trial completion within six months and instructed police to ensure witness attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case