BADRI PRASAD CHELAK vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4546/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010188922026

Filing Number

MCRC/8006/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4546/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BADRI PRASAD CHELAK

    Adv. VIJAY SHANKAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 4546/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected bail for Badri Prasad Chelak, who was arrested for allegedly assaulting a contractor (Vivekanand Verma) with an iron rod at a liquor shop in December 2025, causing grievous head injuries including three lacerated wounds. The Court found specific allegations against Chelak distinguishable from co-accused who received bail, noting that medical evidence and an iron rod recovery supported the prosecution case, and the 11-day delay in FIR filing was adequately explained by the complainant's hospitalization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4546/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 4546/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected bail for Badri Prasad Chelak, who was arrested for allegedly assaulting a contractor (Vivekanand Verma) with an iron rod at a liquor shop in December 2025, causing grievous head injuries including three lacerated wounds. The Court found specific allegations against Chelak distinguishable from co-accused who received bail, noting that medical evidence and an iron rod recovery supported the prosecution case, and the 11-day delay in FIR filing was adequately explained by the complainant's hospitalization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case