RAHUL GIRI GOSWAMI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,Sharad Mishra — WPC/3195/2021
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010188622021
Filing Number
WPC/10173/2021
Filing Date
28-Jul-2021
Registration No
WPC/3195/2021
Registration Date
04-Aug-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL GIRI GOSWAMI
Adv. Yogeshwar Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,Sharad Mishra
-
2.State of Chhattisgarh
-
3.Directorate of Higher Technical Educaton
-
4.Kusha Bhau Thakre Patrakarita awam Jansanchaar Vishwavidyalaya
Adv. ANADI SHARMA
-
5.Pankaj Nayan Pandey
Adv. SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,SHALKI MISHRA
-
6.Ashutosh Mandavi
-
7.Narendra Tripathi
Adv. NEERAJ CHOUBEY
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Summary of WPC No. 3195/2021 In this Writ Petition case, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the university (respondent No. 4) four weeks' time to file its reply. The matter was adjourned for hearing after the reply is filed. Respondents No. 6 and 7 remained unrepresented despite being served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
05-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
09-Sep-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
09-Aug-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
09-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3195/2021
Summary of WPC No. 3195/2021 In this Writ Petition case, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the university (respondent No. 4) four weeks' time to file its reply. The matter was adjourned for hearing after the reply is filed. Respondents No. 6 and 7 remained unrepresented despite being served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts