RAHUL GIRI GOSWAMI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/3204/2021
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010188612021
Filing Number
WPC/10172/2021
Filing Date
28-Jul-2021
Registration No
WPC/3204/2021
Registration Date
05-Aug-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL GIRI GOSWAMI
Adv. Yogeshwar Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.State of Chhattisgarh
-
3.Directorate of Higher Technical Education,
-
4.Kusha Bhau Thakre Patrakarita Awam Jansanchaar
Adv. Arjit Tiwari,Vikram Sharma ANADI SHARMA (WITH NOC) ANSHUL NANDWANI
-
5.Avinaash Kardekar,
Adv. MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,ISHA JAJODIA NEHA SHRIVASTAVA SONAM SHUKLA Somraj Shrivastava SOURABH SAHU
-
6.Chandra sekhar Shivhare
Adv. MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,ISHA JAJODIA SONAM SHUKLA NEHA SHRIVASTAVA SOURABH SAHU Somraj Shrivastava
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned WPC No. 3204/2021 (Rahul Giri Goswami v. State of Chhattisgarh) to the week commencing 29.06.2026. The adjournment was granted due to bereavement in the family of the arguing counsel for respondent No.4, allowing him time to present arguments in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
02-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
09-Aug-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
09-Aug-2021
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
-
28-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3204/2021
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned WPC No. 3204/2021 (Rahul Giri Goswami v. State of Chhattisgarh) to the week commencing 29.06.2026. The adjournment was granted due to bereavement in the family of the arguing counsel for respondent No.4, allowing him time to present arguments in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts