ANIL KUMAR SHARMA vs CHHATTISGARH ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION BOARD Advocate - Trivikram Nayak — WA/478/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010187982026

Filing Number

WA/10825/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WA/478/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR SHARMA

    Adv. P. Acharya,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta, SASWAT MISHRA,MISS SHIVANGHI AGRAWAL,MANEE RAM YADAV,JUHI JAISWAL,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,KABEER KALWANI,MAYANK GUPTA,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,Arpan Verma,Rishabh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHHATTISGARH ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION BOARD Advocate - Trivikram Nayak

  2. 2.Employees, Provident Fund Organization

    Adv. SUNIL PILLAI

  3. 3.Employees Provident Fund Organization

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WA No. 478/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case on 18/06/2026. The respondents were granted four weeks to file their reply, after which the appellant may file a rejoinder within two weeks. The case has been listed for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/478/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA No. 478/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case on 18/06/2026. The respondents were granted four weeks to file their reply, after which the appellant may file a rejoinder within two weeks. The case has been listed for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case