SHAMBHU vs a) RAMPRAKASH Advocate - A.G. 1. — SA/392/2018

Disposed: Contested--NON PROSECUTION on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010186492018

Filing Number

SA/11669/2018

Filing Date

18-Jun-2018

Registration No

SA/392/2018

Registration Date

09-Jul-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMBHU

    Adv. SUSHIL DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.a) RAMPRAKASH Advocate - A.G. 1.

  2. 2.b) Bilaso1.

  3. 3.c) Manmati1.

  4. 4.d) Bimli1.

  5. 5.e) Sangita1.

  6. 6.f) Amani

  7. 7.Tilakdhari

  8. 8.Bedilal

  9. 9.a) Meera Devi(Legal Heir)4.

  10. 10.b) Omkar Gupta4.

  11. 11.c) Sumeshwar4.

  12. 12.d) Vindhali4.

  13. 13.e) Janki4.

  14. 14.f) Jyoti

  15. 15.State of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Second Appeal No. 392 of 2018 filed by Shambhu against Ramprakash and others for want of prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear despite repeated calls on 13/04/2026. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the appeal due to the appellant's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Sep-2018

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  4. 13-Jul-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  5. 13-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/392/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Second Appeal No. 392 of 2018 filed by Shambhu against Ramprakash and others for want of prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear despite repeated calls on 13/04/2026. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the appeal due to the appellant's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case