NIHAL RAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4696/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010186222026

Filing Number

MCRC/7911/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4696/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIHAL RAI

    Adv. MAMTA JAISWAL,AJAY PAL SINGH,AJAY PAL SINGH, ,AMIT KUMAR JAISWAL,ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI,AJAY PAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected bail for Nihal Rai (age 20), arrested for NDPS Act violations involving possession of 1.100 kg heroin recovered from his possession. The Court held that despite the quantity being below commercial threshold, bail was unwarranted due to applicant's two prior criminal antecedents—including a pending 2025 NDPS case—establishing him as a habitual offender who previously misused bail. The Court distinguished his case from co-accused Rajji Kaur's approved bail, which hinged on her lack of criminal history and smaller seizure quantity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4696/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected bail for Nihal Rai (age 20), arrested for NDPS Act violations involving possession of 1.100 kg heroin recovered from his possession. The Court held that despite the quantity being below commercial threshold, bail was unwarranted due to applicant's two prior criminal antecedents—including a pending 2025 NDPS case—establishing him as a habitual offender who previously misused bail. The Court distinguished his case from co-accused Rajji Kaur's approved bail, which hinged on her lack of criminal history and smaller seizure quantity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case