M/S RADHE KRISHNA INDUSTRIES vs NARENDRA SHARMA — MAC/1222/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010185612026

Filing Number

MAC/10691/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

MAC/1222/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT. ( 1206 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RADHE KRISHNA INDUSTRIES

    Adv. YASH VERMA,VINAY KUMAR VERMA,VINAY KUMAR VERMA, ,AYUSH VERMA,AYUSH VERMA,AYUSH VERMA,AMAN ANSARI,Tanuj Patwardhan,VINAY KUMAR VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRA SHARMA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Summary of MAC No. 1222/2026: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Radhe Krishna Industries' appeal challenging the Commissioner's workers' compensation award to employee Narendra Sharma, raising the substantial question of whether the Commissioner misapplied Schedule I, Part II, Serial No. 9 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 in assessing loss of earning capacity. The court partially granted the stay application, directing 50% of the compensation to be disbursed immediately while staying the remaining 50% pending further orders. The case was listed for subsequent hearing with notice issued to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/1222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MAC No. 1222/2026: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Radhe Krishna Industries' appeal challenging the Commissioner's workers' compensation award to employee Narendra Sharma, raising the substantial question of whether the Commissioner misapplied Schedule I, Part II, Serial No. 9 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 in assessing loss of earning capacity. The court partially granted the stay application, directing 50% of the compensation to be disbursed immediately while staying the remaining 50% pending further orders. The case was listed for subsequent hearing with notice issued to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case