BIGEN DAS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2604/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010185232026
Filing Number
WPC/10666/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2604/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ENCROACHMENTS ON GOVERNMENT LAND AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. ( 1708 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIGEN DAS
Adv. PIYUSH BHOI,MOHAMMAD SOHAIL KHAN,MOHAMMAD SOHAIL KHAN, ,MOHAMMAD SOHAIL KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector
-
3.The Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2604/2026 - Bigen Das v. State of Chhattisgarh Bigen Das challenged the State's demolition action on traditionally-used cremation land, alleging arbitrary proceedings and violation of natural justice principles (bulldozer action on 22.01.2026 without prior notice). The court directed the Tahsildar to reconsider and decide the petitioner's reply within 15 days, affording due hearing to all affected parties, while restraining coercive action against the petitioner pending this reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2604/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2604/2026 - Bigen Das v. State of Chhattisgarh Bigen Das challenged the State's demolition action on traditionally-used cremation land, alleging arbitrary proceedings and violation of natural justice principles (bulldozer action on 22.01.2026 without prior notice). The court directed the Tahsildar to reconsider and decide the petitioner's reply within 15 days, affording due hearing to all affected parties, while restraining coercive action against the petitioner pending this reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts