DUDDU PRABHAKAR vs NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY Advocate - Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha, ,B.GOPA KUMAR,HIMANSHU PANDEY,HIMANSHU PANDEY,RAJVANSH SINGH — CRA/1325/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010184062026

Filing Number

CRA/7810/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRA/1325/2026

Registration Date

23-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

BAIL MATTERS UNDER NIA ACT ( 1443 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DUDDU PRABHAKAR

    Adv. AAGNEY SAIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY Advocate - Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha, ,B.GOPA KUMAR,HIMANSHU PANDEY,HIMANSHU PANDEY,RAJVANSH SINGH

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA 1325/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Duddu Prabhakar's criminal revision appeal against the National Investigation Agency, condoning a 9-day delay in filing. The court granted two weeks for NIA to file a reply-affidavit, followed by one week for the petitioner's rejoinder, with the case to be listed immediately thereafter. The case diary photocopy was called for. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/1325/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA 1325/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Duddu Prabhakar's criminal revision appeal against the National Investigation Agency, condoning a 9-day delay in filing. The court granted two weeks for NIA to file a reply-affidavit, followed by one week for the petitioner's rejoinder, with the case to be listed immediately thereafter. The case diary photocopy was called for. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case