SMT. SHANTIBAI BHARTI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2313/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010183922026
Filing Number
WPC/10589/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2313/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ELECTION MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO DISQUALIFICATION TO HOLD THE POSTS IN PANCHAYATS. ( 912 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SHANTIBAI BHARTI
Adv. Tanmay Thomas,GAGAN TIWARI,GAGAN TIWARI, ,SHRISTI UPADHYAY,GAGAN TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.COLLECTORATE
-
3.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICE
-
4.Tahsildar
-
5.Dilbai Bharti
-
6.Manohar Nirala
-
7.Purshottam
-
8.Gyandas Bhardwaj
-
9.Shalki Ram
-
10.Janki Bai
-
11.Sunita Bharti
-
12.Smt, triveni
-
13.Smt, Budhiyarin
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Smt. Shantibai Bharti's writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion passed against her as Sarpanch on 28.04.2026. The court found that she had bypassed the prescribed statutory procedure under Section 21(4) of the C.G. Panchayati Raj Adhiniyam by directly approaching the High Court instead of first filing an application before the concerned Collector. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with directions to the petitioner to approach the Collector under the appropriate statutory provision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2313/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Smt. Shantibai Bharti's writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion passed against her as Sarpanch on 28.04.2026. The court found that she had bypassed the prescribed statutory procedure under Section 21(4) of the C.G. Panchayati Raj Adhiniyam by directly approaching the High Court instead of first filing an application before the concerned Collector. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with directions to the petitioner to approach the Collector under the appropriate statutory provision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts