MUKESH KUMAR JAISWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2317/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010183492026
Filing Number
WPC/10558/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2317/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
STATE CARRIAGE PERMITS. ( 1709 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESH KUMAR JAISWAL
Adv. ANUKUL BISWAS,DURGESHWARI KOSHLE,DURGESHWARI KOSHLE, ,DURGESHWARI KOSHLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Regional Transport Authority,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2317/2026 Mukesh Kumar Jaiswal sought court direction compelling the Regional Transport Authority to decide his pending stage carriage permit application (dated 23.02.2026) for operating a bus on the Pipariya-Korbi route. The petitioner claimed he completed all procedural requirements and documents but faced unreasonable delay, violating his constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing the Regional Transport Authority to consider and decide the application in accordance with law/rules/regulations, while expressly noting it made no determination on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2317/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2317/2026 Mukesh Kumar Jaiswal sought court direction compelling the Regional Transport Authority to decide his pending stage carriage permit application (dated 23.02.2026) for operating a bus on the Pipariya-Korbi route. The petitioner claimed he completed all procedural requirements and documents but faced unreasonable delay, violating his constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing the Regional Transport Authority to consider and decide the application in accordance with law/rules/regulations, while expressly noting it made no determination on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts