Mahendra Shriwas vs State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2298/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010183472026
Filing Number
WPC/10556/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2298/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahendra Shriwas
Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector Sarangarh
-
3.Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaigarh
-
4.Chief Executive Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2298/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition challenging a recovery order of Rs. 2,95,781.50 against ex-Sarpanch Mahendra Shriwas for alleged misappropriation of Gram Panchayat development funds. Without deciding the merits, the court held that the petitioner must first pursue the statutory appeal remedy before the Collector rather than directly approaching the High Court. The petitioner was granted 15 days to file an appeal and 30 days thereafter for the Collector to consider interim relief, with a directive that no coercive action be taken pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2298/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2298/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition challenging a recovery order of Rs. 2,95,781.50 against ex-Sarpanch Mahendra Shriwas for alleged misappropriation of Gram Panchayat development funds. Without deciding the merits, the court held that the petitioner must first pursue the statutory appeal remedy before the Collector rather than directly approaching the High Court. The petitioner was granted 15 days to file an appeal and 30 days thereafter for the Collector to consider interim relief, with a directive that no coercive action be taken pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts