SMT KANTI BAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2289/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010183292026

Filing Number

WPC/10543/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2289/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENCROACHMENTS ON GOVERNMENT LAND AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. ( 1708 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT KANTI BAI

    Adv. J.K. GUPTA,DAMRUDHAR YADAV,DAMRUDHAR YADAV, ,DAMRUDHAR YADAV

  2. 2.Deepak

  3. 3.Dudheshwar Prajapati

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector

  3. 3.Assistant Commissioner

  4. 4.Divisional Forest Officer

  5. 5.The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)

  6. 6.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 2289/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh stayed eviction proceedings against three residents who held a valid patta (lease) granted in 2006. The court found the Tahsildar's eviction warrant prima facie unlawful since the patta was never cancelled, and the eviction violated natural justice principles by denying adequate hearing. The court suspended coercive action for 90 days and directed petitioners to file an appeal before competent authority, which must decide within 90 days with proper hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 2289/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh stayed eviction proceedings against three residents who held a valid patta (lease) granted in 2006. The court found the Tahsildar's eviction warrant prima facie unlawful since the patta was never cancelled, and the eviction violated natural justice principles by denying adequate hearing. The court suspended coercive action for 90 days and directed petitioners to file an appeal before competent authority, which must decide within 90 days with proper hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case