ANANDA CHANDEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2297/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010183022026

Filing Number

WPC/10525/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2297/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENCROACHMENTS ON GOVERNMENT LAND AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. ( 1708 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANDA CHANDEL

    Adv. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan, ,HEMLATA DEWANGAN,Govind Prasad Dewangan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Commissioner

  3. 3.Collector

  4. 4.Chief Municipal Officer

  5. 5.Chief Executive Officer (R)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 2297/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the petitioner's challenge to an encroachment removal notice issued in January 2026. While declining to set aside the notice, the court directed the petitioner to file a representation with authorities within 15 days, which must be decided within 45 days thereafter. The court granted interim protection by prohibiting coercive action against the petitioner pending the authorities' decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2297/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 2297/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the petitioner's challenge to an encroachment removal notice issued in January 2026. While declining to set aside the notice, the court directed the petitioner to file a representation with authorities within 15 days, which must be decided within 45 days thereafter. The court granted interim protection by prohibiting coercive action against the petitioner pending the authorities' decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case