NANU PANDO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4288/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010182882026
Filing Number
MCRC/7772/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
MCRC/4288/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANU PANDO
Adv. ANSHUL TIWARI,ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI,ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI, ,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP,Nupur Trivedi,ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI
-
2.Dheersai Yadav @ Chhottu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Summary: MCRC 4288/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Nanu Pando and Dheersai Yadav, accused of armed robbery under Sections 126(2) and 309(6) BNS. Although Rs. 500 each was recovered from their possession following a street robbery complaint, the court found insufficient direct evidence and considered their prolonged detention (since March 6, 2026), clean criminal records, and family hardship. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/4288/2026
Summary: MCRC 4288/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Nanu Pando and Dheersai Yadav, accused of armed robbery under Sections 126(2) and 309(6) BNS. Although Rs. 500 each was recovered from their possession following a street robbery complaint, the court found insufficient direct evidence and considered their prolonged detention (since March 6, 2026), clean criminal records, and family hardship. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts