CHRISTIAN WELFARE SOCIETY RAJNANDGAON vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2321/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010182642026

Filing Number

WPC/10511/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2321/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

ULTRA VIRES MATTERS ( 1749 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHRISTIAN WELFARE SOCIETY RAJNANDGAON

    Adv. AJAY THAKRE,MANISH UPADHYAY,MANISH UPADHYAY, ,ABHINAV TIWARI,MANISH UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Chief Secretary

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Christian Welfare Society Rajnandgaon seeking to declare subsection 3 to section 4 under chapter 3 of an Act unconstitutional, finding it premature. The court relied on a prior similar order dated 24.04.2026 in WPC No. 1960 of 2026 that had already dismissed an identical petition on the same grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2321/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Christian Welfare Society Rajnandgaon seeking to declare subsection 3 to section 4 under chapter 3 of an Act unconstitutional, finding it premature. The court relied on a prior similar order dated 24.04.2026 in WPC No. 1960 of 2026 that had already dismissed an identical petition on the same grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case