KRITESH KUMAR KUMHAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPPIL/29/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010182182026
Filing Number
WPPIL/10496/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WPPIL/29/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
LETTER PETITION & PIL MATTERS ( 8 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 812 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRITESH KUMAR KUMHAR
Adv. NASIMUDDIN ANSARI,Chandrasen Chouhan,Chandrasen Chouhan, ,KHEMCHAND PRAJAPATI,Smt. Gulshan Ara,RIYAZUDDIN SHEIKH,AJAY KUMAR SAHU,Chandrasen Chouhan
-
2.Mukesh Kumar Chakradhari
-
3.Janak lal Chakradhari
-
4.Kunji lal Chakardhari
-
5.Mulchand Chakradhari
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.COLLECTORATE
-
3.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICE
-
4.Mineral Inspector/Assistant Mineral Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed WPPIL No. 29 of 2026, a public interest petition filed by five petitioners against the State of Chhattisgarh and mineral authorities. The court rejected the petitioners' application for exemption from depositing the mandatory security deposit required under High Court Rules. With the petitioners' consent, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, granting them liberty to refile after depositing the prescribed security amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPPIL/29/2026
Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed WPPIL No. 29 of 2026, a public interest petition filed by five petitioners against the State of Chhattisgarh and mineral authorities. The court rejected the petitioners' application for exemption from depositing the mandatory security deposit required under High Court Rules. With the petitioners' consent, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, granting them liberty to refile after depositing the prescribed security amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts