MANOJ KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4283/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010182102026

Filing Number

MCRC/7717/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4283/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. Siddharth Pandey,MAHESH PANDEY,MAHESH PANDEY, ,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,MAHESH PANDEY

  2. 2.Kiran Yadav

  3. 3.Dagge @ Dageshwar Yadav

  4. 4.Rakesh Kumar Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 4283/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of four applicants (Manoj Kumar Yadav, Kiran Yadav, Dageshwar Yadav, and Rakesh Kumar Sahu) arrested in connection with a communal violence incident. The court found the allegations serious—including unlawful assembly, assault on complainant and police personnel, arson, and property destruction—and cited consistency with earlier rejection of similar bail pleas by co-accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4283/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 4283/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of four applicants (Manoj Kumar Yadav, Kiran Yadav, Dageshwar Yadav, and Rakesh Kumar Sahu) arrested in connection with a communal violence incident. The court found the allegations serious—including unlawful assembly, assault on complainant and police personnel, arson, and property destruction—and cited consistency with earlier rejection of similar bail pleas by co-accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case