MANURAJ MOURYA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4238/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010181842026

Filing Number

MCRC/7705/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4238/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANURAJ MOURYA

    Adv. CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA,MAHI PANDEY,MAHI PANDEY, ,RAKSHITA MISHRA,RAKSHITA MISHRA,DAMRUDHAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    MCRC/4238/2026 Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Manuraj Mourya, accused in an armed robbery case involving Rs. 66.25 lakh and gold chains, after his first two bail applications were rejected. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha approved bail citing that trial conclusion would take considerable time (only 9 of 21 prosecution witnesses examined), the applicant's clean criminal record, lengthy custody since February 2025, and that a similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The applicant must furnish personal bond with two sureties and comply with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance at all material hearings and no adjournment requests when witnesses appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4238/2026

casestatus.in Summary

MCRC/4238/2026 Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Manuraj Mourya, accused in an armed robbery case involving Rs. 66.25 lakh and gold chains, after his first two bail applications were rejected. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha approved bail citing that trial conclusion would take considerable time (only 9 of 21 prosecution witnesses examined), the applicant's clean criminal record, lengthy custody since February 2025, and that a similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The applicant must furnish personal bond with two sureties and comply with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance at all material hearings and no adjournment requests when witnesses appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case