ISHWAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4282/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010181822026

Filing Number

MCRC/7703/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4282/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHWAR SAHU

    Adv. Siddharth Pandey,MAHESH PANDEY,MAHESH PANDEY, ,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,MAHESH PANDEY

  2. 2.Amarsingh Sahu

  3. 3.Manoj Kumar Sahu

  4. 4.Vicky @ Vyanktesh Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4282/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of four accused (Ishwar Sahu, Amarsingh Sahu, Manoj Kumar Sahu, and Vicky Sahu) charged with assault, rioting, and causing injury in connection with a violent village incident involving 30 accused persons and 16 injured victims. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha found the seriousness and organized nature of the offense, combined with prima facie evidence of involvement through witness statements and investigation materials, insufficient to warrant bail. The court directed expeditious trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4282/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of four accused (Ishwar Sahu, Amarsingh Sahu, Manoj Kumar Sahu, and Vicky Sahu) charged with assault, rioting, and causing injury in connection with a violent village incident involving 30 accused persons and 16 injured victims. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha found the seriousness and organized nature of the offense, combined with prima facie evidence of involvement through witness statements and investigation materials, insufficient to warrant bail. The court directed expeditious trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case