KOMAL PRASAD CHANDRAKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4260/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010181772026

Filing Number

MCRC/7699/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4260/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOMAL PRASAD CHANDRAKAR

    Adv. Bidya Nand Mishra,Ganesh Ram Burman,Ganesh Ram Burman, ,Ganesh Ram Burman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Komal Prasad Chandrakar, arrested in a paddy stock shortage case (Crime No. 213/2026) under Section 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court allowed bail primarily on grounds of parity, as a co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail, combined with the applicant's clean criminal record and prolonged detention since April 3, 2026. Bail was conditional upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements and trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4260/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Komal Prasad Chandrakar, arrested in a paddy stock shortage case (Crime No. 213/2026) under Section 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court allowed bail primarily on grounds of parity, as a co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail, combined with the applicant's clean criminal record and prolonged detention since April 3, 2026. Bail was conditional upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements and trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case