VINAY SINGH RAJPUT vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4247/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010181702026

Filing Number

MCRC/7694/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4247/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINAY SINGH RAJPUT

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY,TITRA RAM PATEL,TITRA RAM PATEL, ,TITRA RAM PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4247/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Vinay Singh Rajput, arrested for alleged possession of 41 bottles of controlled cough syrup for sale under Section 21(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court approved bail on grounds of parity, noting that a similarly situated co-accused (Rakesh Pancheshwar) had already been granted bail by the Supreme Court and that the charge-sheet was already filed. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and compliance with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance at key trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4247/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Vinay Singh Rajput, arrested for alleged possession of 41 bottles of controlled cough syrup for sale under Section 21(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court approved bail on grounds of parity, noting that a similarly situated co-accused (Rakesh Pancheshwar) had already been granted bail by the Supreme Court and that the charge-sheet was already filed. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and compliance with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance at key trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case