GULSHAN KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4277/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010181642026

Filing Number

MCRC/7690/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4277/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULSHAN KUMAR SAHU

    Adv. Siddharth Pandey,MAHESH PANDEY,MAHESH PANDEY, ,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,MAHESH PANDEY

  2. 2.Narendra Sahu

  3. 3.Manish Sahu

  4. 4.Piyush Sahu Pintu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4277/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of Gulshan Kumar Sahu, Narendra Sahu, Manish Sahu, and Piyush Sahu Pintu, who are accused of participating in a violent unlawful assembly that assaulted a property dealer, his family, and police personnel with deadly weapons, causing injuries and arson. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha found the gravity and serious nature of allegations—including assault with knives and rods, property destruction, and vehicle arson—precluded bail at that stage, though the trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4277/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4277/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of Gulshan Kumar Sahu, Narendra Sahu, Manish Sahu, and Piyush Sahu Pintu, who are accused of participating in a violent unlawful assembly that assaulted a property dealer, his family, and police personnel with deadly weapons, causing injuries and arson. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha found the gravity and serious nature of allegations—including assault with knives and rods, property destruction, and vehicle arson—precluded bail at that stage, though the trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case