TULSIRAM KANWAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4408/2022

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010181162022

Filing Number

WPS/10004/2022

Filing Date

31-May-2022

Registration No

WPS/4408/2022

Registration Date

24-Jun-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT. ( 613 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TULSIRAM KANWAR

    Adv. Tanuj Patwardhan,RAVI KUAMR TANDAN,RAVI KUAMR TANDAN, ,J.K. GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Deputy Director,

  3. 3.The Collector,

  4. 4.chief Executive officer,

  5. 5.Chief Executive Officer,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary: In WPS No. 4408 of 2022 (Tulsiram Kanwar v. State of Chhattisgarh), the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted time to the petitioner's counsel to remove procedural defaults on 29.06.2022, with the case adjourned for two weeks. In the subsequent hearing on 15.04.2026, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the pointed-out defaults had been rectified, and the court directed the Registry to verify the same. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh SamantView PDF

  4. 29-Jun-2022

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

  5. 31-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4408/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPS No. 4408 of 2022 (Tulsiram Kanwar v. State of Chhattisgarh), the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted time to the petitioner's counsel to remove procedural defaults on 29.06.2022, with the case adjourned for two weeks. In the subsequent hearing on 15.04.2026, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the pointed-out defaults had been rectified, and the court directed the Registry to verify the same. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case