ANAND MISHRA vs DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE Advocate - MANEESH SHARMA — MCRC/5141/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010181152026

Filing Number

MCRC/7670/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5141/2026

Registration Date

06-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND MISHRA

    Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE Advocate - MANEESH SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5141/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Anand Mishra's bail application in an NDPS Act case (Sections 20(C) and 29). Mishra was arrested on 27.02.2026 based on call records and co-accused statements linking him to loading 271.641 kg of contraband ganja, though no drugs were recovered from his possession. The court found bail unsuitable due to two pending NDPS cases against him, characterizing him as a habitual offender, and relying on Supreme Court precedent that previous antecedents warrant bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5141/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5141/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Anand Mishra's bail application in an NDPS Act case (Sections 20(C) and 29). Mishra was arrested on 27.02.2026 based on call records and co-accused statements linking him to loading 271.641 kg of contraband ganja, though no drugs were recovered from his possession. The court found bail unsuitable due to two pending NDPS cases against him, characterizing him as a habitual offender, and relying on Supreme Court precedent that previous antecedents warrant bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case