SMT. SAROJ BAJPAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3958/2026

Disposed: Contested--INFRUCTUOUS on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010181122026

Filing Number

WPS/10445/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/3958/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SAROJ BAJPAI

    Adv. SHAILENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI,F.S.KHARE,F.S.KHARE, ,F.S.KHARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Commissioner/District Census Officer

    Adv. Shaleen Singh Baghel

  3. 3.District Education Officer Bilaspur,

  4. 4.Charge Officer of Census/ Zone Commissioner No. 1 Sakri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Smt. Saroj Bajpai's writ petition as infructuous after the respondent census authorities agreed to her representation and appointed Fekan Dhruv as Enumerator in her place. Since the petitioner's relief was granted through administrative action and her counsel did not dispute the appointment, the court found the petition no longer maintainable and dismissed it while reserving liberty for future proceedings if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3958/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Smt. Saroj Bajpai's writ petition as infructuous after the respondent census authorities agreed to her representation and appointed Fekan Dhruv as Enumerator in her place. Since the petitioner's relief was granted through administrative action and her counsel did not dispute the appointment, the court found the petition no longer maintainable and dismissed it while reserving liberty for future proceedings if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case