CHHATTISGARH RAJYA GRAMIN BANK vs SMT. SHAKEELA KHAN — WP227/550/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010180992026

Filing Number

WP227/10438/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP227/550/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHATTISGARH RAJYA GRAMIN BANK

    Adv. SAKET PANDEY,SURYAKANT YADAV,SURYAKANT YADAV, ,ISHAN SHARMA,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV,ASHUTOSH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SHAKEELA KHAN

  2. 2.Shri Nawab Hussain Khan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the withdrawal of Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank's petition against Smt. Shakeela Khan and Shri Nawab Hussain Khan on 07/05/2026. The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Durg with a suitable application, directing the CJM to conclude the underlying proceedings expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/550/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the withdrawal of Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank's petition against Smt. Shakeela Khan and Shri Nawab Hussain Khan on 07/05/2026. The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Durg with a suitable application, directing the CJM to conclude the underlying proceedings expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case