BHOGILAL SAGAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4780/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010180912026

Filing Number

MCRC/7661/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4780/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHOGILAL SAGAR

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4780/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Bhogilal Sagar's third bail application in a narcotic drugs case (15 kg ganja seizure under NDPS Act Section 20(b)). Although his first bail was granted in February 2024, he absconded for one year despite court orders, disrupting trial proceedings, and surrendered only in September 2025. The court denied bail citing flight risk, ongoing trial with only 5 of 12 witnesses examined, and likelihood of further absconding that would hamper justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4780/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4780/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Bhogilal Sagar's third bail application in a narcotic drugs case (15 kg ganja seizure under NDPS Act Section 20(b)). Although his first bail was granted in February 2024, he absconded for one year despite court orders, disrupting trial proceedings, and surrendered only in September 2025. The court denied bail citing flight risk, ongoing trial with only 5 of 12 witnesses examined, and likelihood of further absconding that would hamper justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case