MRS. RANJULATA PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3965/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010180752026

Filing Number

WPS/10424/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/3965/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SENIORITY. ( 609 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRS. RANJULATA PANDEY

    Adv. AKASH PANDEY,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV, ,KAUSHAL YADAV,SAHDEV YADAV,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.Mr. Shashi Bhushan Sharma

  3. 3.Mrs. Sarita Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director, Public Instructions,

  3. 3.Secretary, department of Panchayat

  4. 4.Sri Vivek Kumar Yadav

  5. 5.Sri Dinesh Singh Bisen

  6. 6.CEO

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    In WPS 3965/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard arguments from both petitioner Mrs. Ranjulata Pandey and the State respondents. The court issued notice to respondents No.4, 5 and 6, directed payment of Provident Fund within 10 days, and adjourned the case for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3965/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WPS 3965/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard arguments from both petitioner Mrs. Ranjulata Pandey and the State respondents. The court issued notice to respondents No.4, 5 and 6, directed payment of Provident Fund within 10 days, and adjourned the case for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case