BANK OF BARODA vs M/S RAKESH KUMAR VAIDYA — WP227/560/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010180722026
Filing Number
WP227/10421/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
WP227/560/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BANK OF BARODA
Adv. SAKET PANDEY,ISHAN SHARMA,ISHAN SHARMA, ,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV,ISHAN SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S RAKESH KUMAR VAIDYA
-
2.Dwarka Prasad Vaidya
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WP227/560/2026 Bank of Baroda v. M/s Rakesh Kumar Vaidya & Dwarka Prasad Vaidya The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the lower Executing Court to expeditiously conclude execution proceedings pending since September 24, 2024, against defaulting borrowers under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The court invoked Supreme Court precedent requiring execution petitions to be disposed within six months and ordered the Executing Court to proceed diligently in accordance with law, subject to party cooperation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP227/560/2026
Case Summary: WP227/560/2026 Bank of Baroda v. M/s Rakesh Kumar Vaidya & Dwarka Prasad Vaidya The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the lower Executing Court to expeditiously conclude execution proceedings pending since September 24, 2024, against defaulting borrowers under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The court invoked Supreme Court precedent requiring execution petitions to be disposed within six months and ordered the Executing Court to proceed diligently in accordance with law, subject to party cooperation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts