VINAY KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3324/2020

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010180492020

Filing Number

WPS/9117/2020

Filing Date

10-Aug-2020

Registration No

WPS/3324/2020

Registration Date

18-Aug-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINAY KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. SONIA KULDEEP,K. RADHIKA,K. RADHIKA, RAJ BAHADUR SINGH,ASHA JAISWAL,K. RADHIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director,

  3. 3.The Principal,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3324/2020 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Vinay Kumar Gupta's writ petition after the petitioner confirmed that his grievance against the State of Chhattisgarh's Higher Education Department had been resolved. The petitioner stated that the disputed amount had been paid to him and that he was currently employed at Government College, Baikunthpur, and no longer wished to pursue the petition further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Aug-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  4. 24-Aug-2020

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

  5. 10-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3324/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3324/2020 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Vinay Kumar Gupta's writ petition after the petitioner confirmed that his grievance against the State of Chhattisgarh's Higher Education Department had been resolved. The petitioner stated that the disputed amount had been paid to him and that he was currently employed at Government College, Baikunthpur, and no longer wished to pursue the petition further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case