KOMAL RAM VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2567/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010179872026
Filing Number
WPC/10373/2026
Filing Date
01-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2567/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOMAL RAM VERMA
Adv. Smt. NEHA SHAH,SHIVAM MISHRA,SHIVAM MISHRA, ,NITESH SAHU,SHIVAM MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Secretary
-
3.The Manager Chhattisgarh
Adv. HARSHAL CHOUHAN
-
4.The Collector
-
5.The District Marketing Officer
-
6.The Chief Executive Officer
-
7.The Deputy Registrar
-
8.The District Food Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2567/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed respondent authorities to decide a paddy procurement dispute within 30 days while restraining them from taking coercive action against petitioner Komal Ram Verma's agricultural cooperative society. The society faced a directive to deliver 455 quintals of paddy allegedly short-supplied under the 2025-26 paddy procurement policy; the court held authorities must decide the petitioner's reply on legal merits without interim enforcement actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
01-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2567/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2567/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed respondent authorities to decide a paddy procurement dispute within 30 days while restraining them from taking coercive action against petitioner Komal Ram Verma's agricultural cooperative society. The society faced a directive to deliver 455 quintals of paddy allegedly short-supplied under the 2025-26 paddy procurement policy; the court held authorities must decide the petitioner's reply on legal merits without interim enforcement actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts