RITESH KUMAR TIWARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4239/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010179602026

Filing Number

MCRC/7599/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4239/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITESH KUMAR TIWARI

    Adv. CHETNA SHARMA,RAJNISH SINGH BAGHEL,RAJNISH SINGH BAGHEL, ,GURU PRASAD KURRE,SAKSHAM SONI,ADARSH RAJPUT,SWEKSHA SHARMA,RAJNISH SINGH BAGHEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4239/2026 Ritesh Kumar Tiwari's bail application for a diesel theft case (Crime No. 309/2025) was granted by the Chhattisgarh High Court. The court found that Tiwari was implicated solely based on a co-accused's statement without corroborating evidence or seizures from his possession, and noted his pending criminal cases don't preclude bail. He was released on personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4239/2026 Ritesh Kumar Tiwari's bail application for a diesel theft case (Crime No. 309/2025) was granted by the Chhattisgarh High Court. The court found that Tiwari was implicated solely based on a co-accused's statement without corroborating evidence or seizures from his possession, and noted his pending criminal cases don't preclude bail. He was released on personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case