RAVIKANT GADHWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3944/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010179412026

Filing Number

WPS/10350/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/3944/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVIKANT GADHWAL

    Adv. AMITESH YADAV,VINOD YADAV,VINOD YADAV, ,VINOD YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector

  3. 3.Assistant Commissioner,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3944/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of petitioner Ravikant Gadhwal's writ petition challenging a February 27, 2026 communication regarding his Rs. 2,50,000 provident fund withdrawal request for his wife's medical treatment. The court found the communication was not a rejection order but a request for supporting documents, and directed Gadhwal to submit all requisite documents within two weeks; the Assistant Commissioner shall then decide his claim within a further two weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3944/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3944/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of petitioner Ravikant Gadhwal's writ petition challenging a February 27, 2026 communication regarding his Rs. 2,50,000 provident fund withdrawal request for his wife's medical treatment. The court found the communication was not a rejection order but a request for supporting documents, and directed Gadhwal to submit all requisite documents within two weeks; the Assistant Commissioner shall then decide his claim within a further two weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case