DEEPAK NISHAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/891/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010179392026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7591/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/891/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK NISHAD

    Adv. D.K.VISHWAKARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA/891/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Deepak Nishad's second anticipatory bail application in a case involving a knife assault. Nishad was allegedly involved in assaulting victim Dipanshu with a knife targeting vital body parts, causing grievous injuries deemed dangerous to life, following a confrontation at Kota Petrol Pump. Despite his claims of false implication and lack of criminal record, the court upheld its earlier rejection, finding the severity and nature of injuries sustained warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/891/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA/891/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Deepak Nishad's second anticipatory bail application in a case involving a knife assault. Nishad was allegedly involved in assaulting victim Dipanshu with a knife targeting vital body parts, causing grievous injuries deemed dangerous to life, following a confrontation at Kota Petrol Pump. Despite his claims of false implication and lack of criminal record, the court upheld its earlier rejection, finding the severity and nature of injuries sustained warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case