AVINASH AWASTHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/691/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010179242026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7585/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/691/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVINASH AWASTHI

    Adv. DEVENDRA PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA No. 691/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Avinash Awasthi, accused in a paddy procurement fraud case involving alleged misappropriation of 20,586.88 quintals and financial loss of ₹6.55 crore. The Chief Justice allowed the bail application based on the principle of parity, noting the applicant had no criminal antecedents, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and a co-accused in similar circumstances had already been granted bail, despite the serious nature of allegations involving government financial loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/691/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA No. 691/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Avinash Awasthi, accused in a paddy procurement fraud case involving alleged misappropriation of 20,586.88 quintals and financial loss of ₹6.55 crore. The Chief Justice allowed the bail application based on the principle of parity, noting the applicant had no criminal antecedents, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and a co-accused in similar circumstances had already been granted bail, despite the serious nature of allegations involving government financial loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case