LALINDRA KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4213/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010178972026

Filing Number

MCRC/7571/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4213/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALINDRA KASHYAP

    Adv. SHIVENDU PANDYA,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK, ,POOJA YADAV,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4213/2026 Lalindra Kashyap's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was ALLOWED. Kashyap was arrested for possessing 40 bulk liters of illicit liquor, charged under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. Though the State opposed bail citing his five previous criminal antecedents (including one similar excise case), the Chief Justice granted regular bail considering the charge-sheet was already filed, trial would take considerable time, and most prior cases were disposed. The applicant must furnish personal bond with two sureties and comply with strict conditions including mandatory court appearance on key trial dates and non-adjournment undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4213/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4213/2026 Lalindra Kashyap's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was ALLOWED. Kashyap was arrested for possessing 40 bulk liters of illicit liquor, charged under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. Though the State opposed bail citing his five previous criminal antecedents (including one similar excise case), the Chief Justice granted regular bail considering the charge-sheet was already filed, trial would take considerable time, and most prior cases were disposed. The applicant must furnish personal bond with two sureties and comply with strict conditions including mandatory court appearance on key trial dates and non-adjournment undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case