RUPNATH SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/685/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010178822026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7563/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/685/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUPNATH SAHU

    Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 685/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rupnath Sahu in a case involving alleged cheating. Sahu was accused of receiving Rs. 36 lakh from a complainant with a promise to execute a registered sale deed for land but failing to do so, triggering charges under BNS sections 318(4) and 3(5). The court allowed the application based on Sahu's clean criminal record and parity grounds, as his co-accused Vaishanv Tandi had already been granted anticipatory bail in a related case, imposing standard bail conditions including personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 685/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rupnath Sahu in a case involving alleged cheating. Sahu was accused of receiving Rs. 36 lakh from a complainant with a promise to execute a registered sale deed for land but failing to do so, triggering charges under BNS sections 318(4) and 3(5). The court allowed the application based on Sahu's clean criminal record and parity grounds, as his co-accused Vaishanv Tandi had already been granted anticipatory bail in a related case, imposing standard bail conditions including personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case