SMT. PUSHPA KAMAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3959/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010178692026

Filing Number

WPS/10313/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/3959/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PUSHPA KAMAL

    Adv. JUHI JAISWAL,P. Acharya,P. Acharya, ,MANEE RAM YADAV,P. Acharya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director,

  3. 3.District Collector,

  4. 4.District Education Officer,

  5. 5.Blocka Education Officer,

  6. 6.Sanjay Kumar Agarwal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3959/2026 - Smt. Pushpa Kamal v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by directing the Block Education Officer to serve the charge-sheet and relevant documents upon the petitioner (an Assistant Teacher promoted as Headmaster) within seven days at her current posting, enabling her to submit an effective reply in the disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that proper service of the charge-sheet was necessary for ensuring fair participation in the inquiry, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations or the validity of the disciplinary action itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3959/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3959/2026 - Smt. Pushpa Kamal v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition by directing the Block Education Officer to serve the charge-sheet and relevant documents upon the petitioner (an Assistant Teacher promoted as Headmaster) within seven days at her current posting, enabling her to submit an effective reply in the disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that proper service of the charge-sheet was necessary for ensuring fair participation in the inquiry, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations or the validity of the disciplinary action itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case