DHONI ALIAS DHUNI YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPCR/256/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010178642026
Filing Number
WPCR/10308/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPCR/256/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHONI ALIAS DHUNI YADAV
Adv. CHITENDRA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Secretary
-
3.Under Secretary
-
4.Director General Prisons
-
5.Collector (District Magistrate)
-
6.Jail Superintendent
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
SUMMARY: WPCR 256/2026 - Dhoni alias Dhuni Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition and quashed the rejection of the petitioner's premature release application. The court held that Rule 358(6)(ix) of the Chhattisgarh Jail Rules (restricting premature release for those convicted of murder in "two or more cases") applies only to convictions in separate, distinct cases—not multiple victims in a single case. Since the petitioner was tried in one sessions trial arising from one incident, the restrictive rule did not apply. The court directed his immediate release, noting his 16+ years imprisonment and satisfactory jail conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCR/256/2026
SUMMARY: WPCR 256/2026 - Dhoni alias Dhuni Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition and quashed the rejection of the petitioner's premature release application. The court held that Rule 358(6)(ix) of the Chhattisgarh Jail Rules (restricting premature release for those convicted of murder in "two or more cases") applies only to convictions in separate, distinct cases—not multiple victims in a single case. Since the petitioner was tried in one sessions trial arising from one incident, the restrictive rule did not apply. The court directed his immediate release, noting his 16+ years imprisonment and satisfactory jail conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts