DR. SHIKHA SHRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3919/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010178452026

Filing Number

WPS/10289/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3919/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION. ( 608 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. SHIKHA SHRIVASTAVA

    Adv. SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,Gaurav Singhal,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Under Secretary (Up-Sachiv)

  3. 3.The Commissioner

  4. 4.The Principal

  5. 5.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (PSC)

    Adv. DR. SUDEEP AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary of WPS/3919/2026 - Dr. Shikha Shrivastava v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition on the basis of limited reliefs sought. Dr. Shrivastava, an Assistant Professor, challenged her non-promotion to Professor, contending that an uncommunicated Annual Confidential Report (ACR) was improperly used against her. The court permitted her to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to Respondents No. 1 & 5, directing them to decide expeditiously within two months, without addressing the merits of her promotion claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3919/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPS/3919/2026 - Dr. Shikha Shrivastava v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition on the basis of limited reliefs sought. Dr. Shrivastava, an Assistant Professor, challenged her non-promotion to Professor, contending that an uncommunicated Annual Confidential Report (ACR) was improperly used against her. The court permitted her to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to Respondents No. 1 & 5, directing them to decide expeditiously within two months, without addressing the merits of her promotion claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case