GORELAL SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCC/457/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010178372026
Filing Number
MCC/10281/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCC/457/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO MODIFICATION AND CLARIFICATION ( 1733 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GORELAL SAHU
Adv. KANCHAN KALWANI,GAYATRI SAHU,GAYATRI SAHU, ,HRISHABH DEO SHUKLA,SHASHWAT RAI,AAYUSH TAMBOLI
-
2.Vimal Kishor Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.COLLECTORATE
-
3.Sub Divisional Officer, (R)
-
4.Tehsildar
-
5.Dhruw Kumar Sahu
-
6.Chhote Bai Kashyap
-
7.Arun Kashyap
-
8.Bimla Kashyap
-
9.Varun Kashyap
-
10.Jai kashyap
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
Case Summary: MCC 457/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court permitted applicants Gorelal Sahu and Vimal Kishor Sahu to withdraw an appeal filed before the Sub-Divisional Officer after discovering their Section 248 Land Revenue Code application had already been allowed by the Tahsildar on 23.07.2025. The applicants' previous counsel had inadvertently misrepresented the application's status during an earlier writ petition (WPC 4799/2025), leading the court to grant liberty to file an appeal, which the applicants then mistakenly filed despite the favorable order already existing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCC/457/2026
Case Summary: MCC 457/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court permitted applicants Gorelal Sahu and Vimal Kishor Sahu to withdraw an appeal filed before the Sub-Divisional Officer after discovering their Section 248 Land Revenue Code application had already been allowed by the Tahsildar on 23.07.2025. The applicants' previous counsel had inadvertently misrepresented the application's status during an earlier writ petition (WPC 4799/2025), leading the court to grant liberty to file an appeal, which the applicants then mistakenly filed despite the favorable order already existing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts