CHIMANLAL SHRIWASTAVA VIMAL PATHAK, ,PALAASH JHA,SWATI RANI SARAF,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,ANAMIKA JAIN,SHALVIN SHARMA,PRIYANSHI DUBEY,DEVERSHI THAKUR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/699/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010178092026
Filing Number
MCRCA/7538/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/699/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHIMANLAL SHRIWASTAVA VIMAL PATHAK, ,PALAASH JHA,SWATI RANI SARAF,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,ANAMIKA JAIN,SHALVIN SHARMA,PRIYANSHI DUBEY,DEVERSHI THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRCA 699/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Chimanlal Shriwastava, an alleged embezzler accused under Section 409 IPC for misappropriating Rs. 1,17,014/- during his tenure as Acting Branch Postmaster. Reasoning: The court allowed the application primarily due to the applicant's advanced age (65 years), considering that incarceration would cause irreversible health decline and that trial completion would take considerable time. Bail was granted subject to conditions including personal bond with surety, non-interference with witnesses, regular court attendance, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/699/2026
Case Summary: MCRCA 699/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Chimanlal Shriwastava, an alleged embezzler accused under Section 409 IPC for misappropriating Rs. 1,17,014/- during his tenure as Acting Branch Postmaster. Reasoning: The court allowed the application primarily due to the applicant's advanced age (65 years), considering that incarceration would cause irreversible health decline and that trial completion would take considerable time. Bail was granted subject to conditions including personal bond with surety, non-interference with witnesses, regular court attendance, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts