RAVINDRA KUMAR YADAV RAVI BHAGAT, ,DEEPAK KUMAR,GOURAV PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3897/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010177942026

Filing Number

WPS/10268/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3897/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SENIORITY. ( 609 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDRA KUMAR YADAV RAVI BHAGAT, ,DEEPAK KUMAR,GOURAV PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director General of Police

  3. 3.Inspector General Of Police

  4. 4.Superintendent of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3897/2026 Ravindra Kumar Yadav, a Head Constable, challenged a promotion list where he was ranked below a junior head constable. The Chhattisgarh High Court found the petition premature since objections had been called on 30.04.2026 and the petitioner had already submitted his objection on 28.04.2026. The Court disposed of the petition without deciding on merits but directed authorities to consider all objections in accordance with law before issuing promotion orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3897/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3897/2026 Ravindra Kumar Yadav, a Head Constable, challenged a promotion list where he was ranked below a junior head constable. The Chhattisgarh High Court found the petition premature since objections had been called on 30.04.2026 and the petitioner had already submitted his objection on 28.04.2026. The Court disposed of the petition without deciding on merits but directed authorities to consider all objections in accordance with law before issuing promotion orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case