LAKHAN LAL PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4279/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010177892026

Filing Number

MCRC/7525/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4279/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHAN LAL PATEL

    Adv. PAWAN KESHARWANI,ADITI DIWAN,ADITI DIWAN, ,PAWAN KESHARWANI,ADITI DIWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC No. 4279/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Lakhan Lal Patel, arrested for illegal possession of bear parts under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. The court found that while bear parts were discovered at his residence, co-accused Pankaj Sahu stated he had concealed them without the applicant's knowledge and intended to retrieve them later. Considering the applicant's clean criminal record, lengthy detention since January 24, 2026, and the prolonged trial timeline, the court approved bail with stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance at critical trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC No. 4279/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Lakhan Lal Patel, arrested for illegal possession of bear parts under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. The court found that while bear parts were discovered at his residence, co-accused Pankaj Sahu stated he had concealed them without the applicant's knowledge and intended to retrieve them later. Considering the applicant's clean criminal record, lengthy detention since January 24, 2026, and the prolonged trial timeline, the court approved bail with stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance at critical trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case