PRAKASH @ SAGAR @ CHEME SARATHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4324/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010177532026

Filing Number

MCRC/7508/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4324/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH @ SAGAR @ CHEME SARATHI

    Adv. Ashutosh Biswas,PRASHANT DANSENA,PRASHANT DANSENA, ,PRASHANT DANSENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4324/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Prakash @ Sagar @ Cheme Sarathi, arrested for house trespass and theft of ₹15,000 cash and utensils worth ₹10,000 from a complainant's house. Although the court acknowledged involvement in the offense and the applicant's three prior criminal antecedents, it balanced these against his incarceration since July 29, 2025, prior acquittals in two cases, and the likely duration of trial proceedings. Bail was granted with conditions requiring personal bonds, sureties, court attendance, and restrictions on adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4324/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4324/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Prakash @ Sagar @ Cheme Sarathi, arrested for house trespass and theft of ₹15,000 cash and utensils worth ₹10,000 from a complainant's house. Although the court acknowledged involvement in the offense and the applicant's three prior criminal antecedents, it balanced these against his incarceration since July 29, 2025, prior acquittals in two cases, and the likely duration of trial proceedings. Bail was granted with conditions requiring personal bonds, sureties, court attendance, and restrictions on adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case