SMT. JYOTI MISHRA VIMAL PATHAK, ,SWATI RANI SARAF,SWATI RANI SARAF,ANAMIKA JAIN,ANAMIKA JAIN,PALAASH JHA,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,SHALVIN SHARMA,DEVERSHI THAKUR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4216/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010177432026
Filing Number
MCRC/7504/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/4216/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. JYOTI MISHRA VIMAL PATHAK, ,SWATI RANI SARAF,SWATI RANI SARAF,ANAMIKA JAIN,ANAMIKA JAIN,PALAASH JHA,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,SHALVIN SHARMA,DEVERSHI THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC 4216/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Smt. Jyoti Mishra on her third bail application in a cyber fraud case involving alleged mule bank accounts used to route proceeds of online scams totaling Rs. 64,10,855. Though the court noted her bank account received substantial cyber fraud proceeds, it allowed bail based on parity grounds, as identically situated co-accused (Ishika Singh, Avinash Tandekar, Krishna Ghodesawar, and Abhinav Nagwanshi) had been granted bail by the Supreme Court or High Court. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance requirements including mandatory courtroom presence at key trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/4216/2026
Case Summary: MCRC 4216/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Smt. Jyoti Mishra on her third bail application in a cyber fraud case involving alleged mule bank accounts used to route proceeds of online scams totaling Rs. 64,10,855. Though the court noted her bank account received substantial cyber fraud proceeds, it allowed bail based on parity grounds, as identically situated co-accused (Ishika Singh, Avinash Tandekar, Krishna Ghodesawar, and Abhinav Nagwanshi) had been granted bail by the Supreme Court or High Court. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance requirements including mandatory courtroom presence at key trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts