MD. SHAHBAZ SIDDIQUI vs STATE OF C.G. — WPS/3962/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010177222026
Filing Number
WPS/10228/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3962/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. SHAHBAZ SIDDIQUI
Adv. Wasim Miyan,Rajbahadur Singh,Rajbahadur Singh, ,MEGHA MISHRA,MEGHA MISHRA,Rajbahadur Singh,Rajbahadur Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF C.G.
-
2.Superintendent of Police
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/3962/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition as premature. Constable Md. Shahbaz Siddiqui sought court direction to release mediclaim reimbursement of Rs. 3,55,014 for his wife's pregnancy complications and newborn's treatment in Ahmedabad, arguing the authorities had not acted on his application dated 25.04.2026. The court held that since the mediclaim application was still pending consideration before the competent authority with no rejection or refusal, filing a writ petition without awaiting administrative decision was premature and did not meet the exceptional circumstances threshold for High Court intervention under Article 226. The petition was dismissed with liberty to approach appropriate forums if the application remains undecided within a reasonable period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3962/2026
Case Summary: WPS/3962/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition as premature. Constable Md. Shahbaz Siddiqui sought court direction to release mediclaim reimbursement of Rs. 3,55,014 for his wife's pregnancy complications and newborn's treatment in Ahmedabad, arguing the authorities had not acted on his application dated 25.04.2026. The court held that since the mediclaim application was still pending consideration before the competent authority with no rejection or refusal, filing a writ petition without awaiting administrative decision was premature and did not meet the exceptional circumstances threshold for High Court intervention under Article 226. The petition was dismissed with liberty to approach appropriate forums if the application remains undecided within a reasonable period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts