RAM KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — MCRCA/675/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010177112026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7488/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/675/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM KUMAR SAHU

    Adv. SHIVENDU PANDYA,POOJA YADAV,POOJA YADAV, ,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK,POOJA YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 675/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Ram Kumar Sahu, accused of forgery and cheating in a land transaction dispute (Crime No. 179/2026). The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since investigation was ongoing, no charge-sheet had been filed, and the applicant had no criminal history. The court also extended parity relief, as co-accused persons had already been granted regular bail, placing the applicant on similar footing. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including personal bond with surety and appearance before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/675/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 675/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Ram Kumar Sahu, accused of forgery and cheating in a land transaction dispute (Crime No. 179/2026). The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since investigation was ongoing, no charge-sheet had been filed, and the applicant had no criminal history. The court also extended parity relief, as co-accused persons had already been granted regular bail, placing the applicant on similar footing. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including personal bond with surety and appearance before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case